STATISTICS AND GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS

by Terry Seed

Why do we measure gene expression? The most common experiment is comparative: we want to compare the mRNA levels of one or more genes in cells from different sources. Comparisons of interest include tumour vs normal cells, cells from a specific organ in a mutant or genetically modified organism vs cells from the same organ in a normal organism of the same strain, and cells before and after an intervention such as a drug treatment. Another important class is the time-course experiments, where cells are sampled at different times, e.g. after the administration of a drug, or as the cell cycle or development proceeds, and interest is in temporal patterns of gene expression. Yet other experiments focus on spatial patterns of gene expression. There are many other kinds of gene expression experiments, essentially as many as there are organisms, cell types and conditions of biological interest.

How do we measure gene expression? As stated above, there are many techniques for doing so, but most rely on DNA-RNA or DNA-DNA hybridization. This is the process through which single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules and and base-pair with their complementary sequences amidst a complex mixture of many molecules of the same kind. The terminology we adopt names the sequence representing a gene of interest the probe, while the pool within which a complemen-tary copy of the probe is sought is named the target DNA or RNA. Other terminologies are the reverse of ours.

On what scale do we measure gene expression? Much of the recent interest by statisticians in this area stems from the availability of data sets giving expression measurements on tens of thousands of genes,so-called microarray gene expression data. However, nylon membrane filters with thousands of genes spotted on them have been around for over a decade, and smaller-scale quantitative expression data for much longer. We begin with a discussion of the first and simplest method of quantifying RNA, as many of the features of the high-throughput methods are already present here.

Real-time PCR Statistics

PCR Encyclopedia (2005): 101127-49 http://www.pcr-encyclopedia.com/

PDF Joshua S. Yuan and C. Neal Stewart Jr.

Department of Plant Sciences and Genomics Hub, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

Statistical Selection of Maintenance Genes for Normalization of Gene Expressions.

Yifan Huang Jason C. Hsu† Mario Peruggia‡ Abigail A. Scott

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Volume 5, Issue 1 2006 Article 4

Maintenance genes can be used for normalization in the comparison of gene expressions. Even though the absolute expression levels of maintenance genes may vary considerably among different tissues or cells, a set of maintenance genes may provide suitable normalization if their expression levels are relatively constant in the specific tissues or cells of interest. A statistical procedure is proposed to select maintenance genes for normalization of gene expression data from tissues or cells of interest. This procedure is based on simultaneous confidence intervals for practical equivalence of relative gene expressions in these tissues or cells. As an illustration, the procedure is applied to the maintenance gene expression data from Vandesompele et al. (2002).

Statistical Significance of quantitative PCR.

Yann Karlen , Alan McNair , Sebastien Perseguers , Christian Mazza & Nicolas Mermod

BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8: 131

Background
PCR has the potential to detect and precisely quantify specific DNA sequences, but it is not yet often used as a fully quantitative method. A number of data collection and processing strategies have been described for the implementation of quantitative PCR. However, they can be experimentally cumbersome, their relative performances have not been evaluated systematically, and they often remain poorly validated statistically and/or experimentally. In this study, we evaluated the performance of known methods, and compared them with newly developed data processing strategies in terms of sensitivity, precision and robustness.

Results
Our results indicate that simple methods that do not rely on the estimation of the efficiency of the PCR amplification may provide reproducible and sensitive data, but that they do not quantify DNA with precision. Other evaluated methods based on sigmoidal or exponential curve fitting were generally of both poor sensitivity and precision. A statistical analysis of the parameters that influence efficiency indicated that it depends mostly on the selected amplicon and to a lesser extent on the particular biological sample analyzed. Thus, we devised various strategies based on individual or averaged efficiency values, which were used to assess the regulated expression of several genes in response to a growth factor.

Conclusions
Overall, qPCR data analysis methods differ significantly in their performance, and this analysis identifies methods that provide DNA quantification estimates of high precision, robustness and reliability. These methods allow reliable estimations of relative expression ratio of two-fold or higher, and our analysis provides an estimation of the number of biological samples that have to be analyzed to achieve a given precision.

Statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control of real-time PCR.

Marubini E, Verderio P, Raggi CC, Pazzagli M, Orlando C; Italian Network for
Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomakers; Italian Society of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology.

Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Orginal Paper:   Int J Biol Markers. 2004 Apr-Jun; 19(2): 141-146

Erratum:  Int J Biol Markers. 2004 Jul-Sep; 19(3): 256

Besides the application of conventional qualitative PCR as a valuable tool to enrich or identify specific sequences of nucleic acids, a new revolutionary technique for quantitative PCR determination has been introduced recently. It is based on real-time detection of PCR products revealed as a homogeneous accumulating signal generated by specific dyes. However, as far as we know, the influence of the variability of this technique on the reliability of the quantitative assay has not been thoroughly investigated. A national program of external quality assurance (EQA) for real-time PCR determination involving 42
Italian laboratories has been developed to assess the analytical performance of real-time PCR procedures. Participants were asked to perform a conventional experiment based on the use of an external reference curve (standard curve) for real-time detection of three cDNA samples with different concentrations of a specific target. In this paper the main analytical features of the standard curve have been investigated in an attempt to produce statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control. Specific control charts were drawn to help biochemists take technical decisions aimed at improving the performance of their laboratories. Overall, our results indicated a subset of seven laboratories whose performance appeared to be markedly outside the limits for at least one of the standard curve features investigated. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the approach presented here for monitoring the heterogeneity of results produced by different laboratories and for selecting those laboratories that need technical advice on their performance.

Statistical Inference for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Using a Hidden Markov Model:
A Bayesian Approach

Nadia Lalam, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1, Article 10.

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (Q-PCR) aims at determining the initial quantity of specific nucleic acids from the observation of the number of amplified DNA molecules. The most widely used technology to monitor the number of DNA molecules as they replicate is based on fluorescence chemistry. Considering this measurement technique, the observation of DNA amplification by PCR contains intrinsically two kinds of variability. On the one hand, the number of replicated DNA molecules is random, and on the other hand, the measurement of the fluorescence emitted by the DNA molecules is collected with some random error. Relying on a stochastic model of these two types of variability, we aim at providing estimators of the parameters arising in the proposed model, and, more specifically, of the initial amount of molecules. The theory of branching processes is classically used to model the evolution of the number of DNA molecules at each replication cycle. The model is a binary splitting Galton-Watson branching process. Its unknown parameters are the initial number of DNA molecules and the reaction efficiency of PCR, which is defined as the probability of replication of a DNA molecule. The number of DNA molecules is indirectly observed through noisy fluorescence measurements resulting in a so-called Hidden Markov Model. We aim at inference of the parameters of the underlying branching process, and the parameters of the noise from the fluorescence measurements in a Bayesian framework. Using simulations and experimental data, we investigate the performance of the Bayesian estimators obtained by Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods.

Common practice in molecular biology may introduce statistical bias and misleading biological interpretation.

Hocquette JF, Brandstetter AM.
J Nutr Biochem. 2002 Jun;13(6):370-377. 



Unite de Recherches sur les Herbivores, Equipe Croissance et Metabolismes du
Muscle, Theix, 63122, Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France

In studies on enzyme activity or gene expression at the protein level, data are usually analyzed by using a standard curve after subtracting blank values. In most cases and for most techniques (spectrophotometric assays, ELISA), this approach satisfies the basic principles of linearity and specificity. In our experience, this might be also the case for Western-blot analysis. By contrast, mRNA data are usually presented as arbitrary units of the ratio of a target RNA over levels of a control RNA species. We here demonstrate by simple experiments and various examples that this data-normalization procedure may result in misleading conclusions. Common molecular biology techniques have never been carefully tested according to the basic principles of validation of quantitative techniques. We thus prefer a regression-based approach for quantifying mRNA levels relatively to a control RNA species by Northern-blot, semi-quantitative RT-PCR or similar techniques. This type of techniques is also characterized by a lower reproducibility for repeated assays when compared to biochemical analyses. Therefore, we also recommend to design experiments, which allow the detection of a similar range of variance by biochemical and molecular biology techniques. Otherwise, spurious conclusions may be provided regarding the control level of gene expression.

Confidence interval estimation for DNA and mRNA concentration by real-time PCR:
A new environment for an old theorem.

Verderio P, Orlando C, Casini Raggi C, Marubini E.
Int J Biol Markers. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):76-9. 



Operative Unit of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Istituto Nazionale per lo
Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.  paolo.verderio@istitutotumori.mi.it



Bravais-Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients: meaning, test of hypothesis and confidence interval.

Artusi R, Verderio P, Marubini E.

Int J Biol Markers. 2002 Apr-Jun;17(2):148-51. 



Operative Unit of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Istituto Nazionale per lo
Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Biostatistics and tumor marker studies in breast cancer: design, analysis and interpretation issues.

Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Marubini E.
Int J Biol Markers. 2003 Jan-Mar;18(1):40-8.



Unita di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la
Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.   biganzoli@istitutotumori.mi.it

SAS programs for real-time RT-PCR having multiple independent samples.

Cook P, Fu C, Hickey M, Han ES, Miller KS.
Biotechniques. 2004 Dec;37(6): 990-995.



University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.

Relative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) has become an important tool for quantifying changes in messenger RNA (mRNA) populations following differential development or stimulation of tissues or cells. However, the best methods for conducting such experiments and analyzing the resultant data remain an issue of discussion. In this report we describe an appropriate experimental methodology and the computer programs necessary to generate a meaningful statistical analysis of the combined biological and experimental variability in such experiments. Specifically, logarithmic transformations of raw fluorescence data from the log-linear portion of real-time PCR growth curves for both target and reference genes are analyzed using a SAS/STAT Mixed Procedure program specifically designed to give a point estimate of the relative expression ratio of the target gene with associated 95% confidence interval. The program code is open-source and is printed in the text.

Relative Expression Software Tool (REST©) for group wise comparison
and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR

Michael W. Pfaffl Graham W. Horgan & Leo Dempfle
Nucleic Acids Research 2002 May 1; 30(9): E36

=> download latest REST versions <=