
HRM - High Resoltution Melt
page (1)
page (2)
HRM
Introduction
High Resolution
Melting (HRM) is a novel,
homogeneous, close-tube, post-PCR
method, enabling genomic researchers to analyze genetic variations
(SNPs, mutations, methylations) in PCR amplicons. It goes beyond the
power of classical melting curve analysis by allowing to study the
thermal denaturation of a double-stranded DNA in much more detail and
with much higher information yield than ever before. HRM
characterizes nucleic acid samples based on their disassociation
(melting) behavior. Samples can be discriminated according to their
sequence, length, GC content or strand complementarity. Even single
base changes such as SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) can be
readily identified.
The most important High Resolution
Melting application is gene scanning - the search for the presence of
unknown variations in PCR amplicons prior to or as an alternative to
sequencing. Mutations in PCR products are detectable by High Resolution
Melting because they change the shape of DNA melting curves. A
combination of new-generation DNA dyes, high-end instrumentation and
sophisticated analysis software allows to detect these changes and to
derive information about the underlying sequence constellation.
HRM
Applications
The
introduction of HRM has renewed interest in the utility of DNA melting
for a wide range of uses, including:
|
- Mutation
discovery (gene scanning)
- Screening
for loss of heterozygosity
- DNA
fingerprinting
- SNP
genotyping
- Characterization
of haplotype blocks
- DNA
methylation analysis
- DNA
mapping
|
- Species
identification
- Somatic
acquired mutation ratios
- HLA
compatibility typing
- Association
(case/control) studies
- Allelic
prevalence in a population
- Identification
of candidate predisposition genes
|
With HRM, these
and other applications are done using low-cost generic dyes where
previously custom labeled probes such as TaqMan® or fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (FRET) probes were required. HRM is thus a
simpler and much more cost-effective way to characterize samples.
For several years, various researchers and instrument makers have
independently investigated the utility of high-resolution DNA
dissociation analysis. For example, the team at Idaho Technology has
done an admirable job of vigorously promoting their research through
traditional journal publications. Conversely, Corbett Life Science does
not pursue publication, but instead relies on the publications of
customers to promote the technology. Regardless, both companies have
independently advanced the field of high resolution dissociation
analysis and successfully introduced what has now become known as high
resolution melt (HRM) analysis.
Idaho
Technology was first to market with an instrument made
specifically to do dissociation analysis; the HR-1. The HR-1 was a
showpiece for the technology with the singular aim of producing the
most detailed melt curve possible. As such, it opened the eyes of many
to the potential of HRM and remains the performance benchmark for the
acquisition of an individual melt curve. However the HR-1 is not
capable of thermal cycling and can only analyze a single sample from
within a glass capillary per run making data analysis time consuming. http://www.idahotech.com/HR-1/index.html
Multi-well instruments with greater practical utility were introduced
to the market very soon after the HR-1. The first multi-well HRM
instruments were the Rotor-Gene
6000 (Corbett Life Science) and the LightScanner
(Idaho Technology) (PDF). These
two instruments were introduced
at about the same time but employed fundamentally different technical
innovations to achieve HRM. The LightScanner uses a modified
block-based design available in 96-well or 384-well versions. Despite
advanced engineering, it still suffers from measurable sample-to-sample
thermal and optical variation and is unable to match the performance
benchmark set by the original HR-1 instrument. Like the HR-1, the
LightScanner is not capable of thermal cycling.
The Rotor-Gene 6000 was the first of
the multi-well instruments capable
of both thermal cycling and HRM. This dual capability enables samples
to be fully processed in the one instrument (i.e. pre-amplification and
HRM done consecutively in the one run). A major advantage of this is
that amplification plots can be used to help interpret HRM results
since aberrant amplification plots (i.e. those that amplified
differently to what was expected) also produce aberrant HRM data. In
this way compromised samples can be easily identified and removed from downstream HRM
analysis. The main advantage of the Rotor-Gene for HRM
stems from its rotary design, in which samples spin under centrifugal
force past a common optical detector. This is seemingly ideal for HRM
as thermal or optical variation between samples is insignificant. The
result is that the Rotor-Gene HRM performance closely matches the HR-1
benchmark with the compromise that samples are not arranged in a
conventional array format (as they are in block-based instruments) but
are instead arranged around the perimeter of a spinning rotor.
The more recently introduced LightCycler
480 (Roche Molecular Systems)
is capable of HRM and thermal cycling. The LightCycler 480 is
a block-based instrument design and it
has better thermal uniformity than other block-based instruments, it
nevertheless does exhibit measurable thermal and optical non-uniformity.
Other instrument providers are now rushing to introduce HRM capability
and some are planning to release software upgrades to support HRM
analysis. The danger here is that instruments not specifically
engineered for HRM will deviate so much from the HR-1 performance
benchmark that careful investigation will need be done before accepting
those instruments as HRM capable.
|
Example HRM data for
each of the multi-well HRM systems discussed here
is shown in the figures (A-E) below.
For comparison
purposes, similar data for two standard
real-time PCR instruments (i.e. not engineered for HRM) is also shown.
All data has been enlarged without modification directly from (Herrmann et al 2007)
Normalized melting curves of a 110 bp beta-globin amplicon
(triplicate HRM data) containing single and double SNPs are shown.
|
|
A: Rotor-Gene: all
four genotypes are clearly distinguished
(click figure to
enlarge)
|
 |
|
B:
LightScanner: only heterozygotes can be distinguished (PDF)
(click figure to
enlarge)
|
 |
|
C: LightCycler 480:
double heterozygote can be clearly distinguished
(click figure to
enlarge)
|
 |
|
D: AB 7300:
double heterozygotes can be distinguished
(click figure to
enlarge)
|
 |
|
E: MasterCycler:
none of the genotypes can be distinguished
(click figure to
enlarge)
|
 |
HRM data normalizationshape
& shift
There are two ways
HRM curve plots can discriminate between samples;
by “Shape” ,
i.e. using detail in the shape of the melt curve itself and
by “Shift”; i.e.
the thermal offset of a curve from other curves.
Before HRM curves are plotted, the raw data is first normalized. Melt
curves are normally plotted with fluorescence on the Y axis and
temperature on the X axis. This is similar to real-time PCR
amplification plots but with the substitution of temperature for cycle
number. As with real-time PCR plots, the fluorescence axis of HRM plots
is normalized onto a 0 to 100% scale.
An emerging trend is to also apply normalization to the temperature (X)
axis. This has the desired effect of compensating for well-to-well
temperature measurement variations between samples. Known as
“temperature shifting”, it was introduced by Idaho Technology and is
now also supported by the Roche LightCycler 480. Unfortunately,
temperature shifting normalization removes any potential discriminatory
power provided by the temperature data.
For some applications, temperature shifting normalization may be a
useful solution but for many routine applications it is actually
detrimental. A good example of this is the discrimination of homozygous
SNPs. On the one hand, heterozygous samples are often more easily
discriminated after temperature shifting normalization (because their
curves have a complex shape), but the discrimination of homozygous
samples is usually made more difficult because they often have a simple
and identical curve shape (Figure 1).
While homozygous SNP samples have an identical curve shape, they can
usually be discriminated by HRM analysis by observing a change in their
respective Tm’s. This characteristic means the melt plots of different
homozygotes will be offset one from another thereby allowing them to be
readily discriminated (so long as temperature shifting normalization is
not applied and the HRM temperature data is precise enough). Currently,
the only instrument system that does not use temperature shifting
normalization and can reliably discriminate homozygous SNPs is the
Rotor-Gene (Corbett Life Science). The Rotor-Gene can discriminate
homozygotes because well-to-well thermal variation is so low on that
instrument that the collected temperature data is sufficiently precise (Figure 2).
|
 |
|
|
Figure 1: Thermal
shifting normalization on the LightCycler 480 (Roche Applied Science)
Triplicate HRM data
was captured on a Roche LightCycler 480 for SNP genotyping (Herrmann et al 2007)
Normalized melting curves are of a 110 bp beta-globin amplicon.
Genotypes are discriminated by color as follows; green = homozygous
wild type, red = homozygous mutant (20A>T), black = single
heterozygous mutant (20A>T), blue = double heterozygous mutant
[9C>T; 20A>T]. Plots are shown before (A) and after (B)
temperature shifting normalization. Double normalized melt curves of
homozygous genotypes overlay and cannot be discriminated; however,
discrimination of heterozygous genotypes is improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Figure 2: Thermal
sifting normalization on the Rotor-Gene (Corbett Life Science)
Triplicate HRM data
was captured on a Rotor-Gene for SNP genotyping (Herrmann et al 2007)
Normalized melting curves are of a 110 bp beta-globin amplicon. Each
category of SNP genotype can be readily discriminated prior to thermal
shifting normalization. However, when curves are thermal shifted the
homozygous genotypes overlay precisely and can no longer be
discriminated.
|
|
High-resolution DNA
Melting Analysis
When it comes to
genotyping and mutation scanning, high-resolution DNA melting is
emerging as the technique of choice because it is inexpensive simple,
accurate and rapid. Development of this method of DNA analysis
has been underway since its introduction in 2002 by a team of
researchers from our Pathology Department led by Dr. Carl Wittwer and
Dr. Karl Voelkerding at the University of Utah coupled with
collaborative efforts from Idaho Technology. High-resolution melting
required new instrumentation. The first high-resolution
instrument developed, named the HR-1, remains the most accurate with
the fastest analysis speed, while the LightScanner has the highest
throughput. In addition to the special instrumentation, high-resolution
melting uses special saturation dyes that fluoresce only in the
presence of double stranded DNA. These dyes are included in the
PCR amplification process. When the sample is heated to high
temperatures, the DNA denatures and the fluorescent color fades away as
the double stranded DNA separates, generating a melting curve. Because
different genetic sequences melt at slightly different rates, they can
be viewed, compared, and detected using these curves. Even a
single base change will cause differences in the melting curve.
The process can be used for specific genotyping, comparing sequence
identity between two DNA samples, and scanning for any sequence variant
between two primers. High-resolution DNA
melting is becoming more popular as its
accuracy and simplicity is recognized. High-res DNA melting makes
it
possible to quickly and accurately determine whether DNA sequences
match, providing an interesting option for transplantation matching and
forensics. Genotyping via
high-resolution melting is more streamlined and
less expensive than methods that use complex probes.
|
|

No processing is
required, and when combined with the speed of rapid-cylce PCR, has
interesting potential for personal DNA diagnostics. For example, the
amount of medication a person needs is often dependent on sequence
variants in genes that can be determined through high-resolution DNA
melting. Hi-res melting can also be used to scan large genes for
variation, in
many cases greatly reducing or eliminating the need for sequencing.
Although high-resolution DNA melting is relatively new, it is expanding
and being improved upon by our talented team of scientists in Pathology
and we are excited to be at the forefront of such innovative and
important technology.
|
More information
at http://www.path.utah.edu/news/hi-res-dna-melting-analysis
|
HRM
Workflow in the LC 480
Gene Scanning by High Resolution Melting Curve
Analysis generally requires the use of
- a special generic DNA dye
that works at high, saturating concentrations without inhibiting PCR
and therefore leads to homogeneous staining of homo-or heteroduplex DNA
- an
instrument with suitable excitation/emmission wavelengths, high data
acquisition rates, and outstanding temperature homogeneity
- a software algorithm that analyzes the shape of the
melting curves and groups those that are similar.
In a Gene Scanning experiment, sample DNA is
first amplified via
real-time PCR in the presence of a proprietary saturating DNA dye. A
melting curve is then performed using high data acquisition
rates, and data are finally analyzed using a Gene Scanning Software, by
three basic steps:
- Normalization: the pre-melt (initial
fluorescence) and post-melt
(final fluorescence)
signals of all samples are set to uniform, relative values from 100% to
0%
- Temperature
shifting: the
temperature axis of the normalized melting curves is shifted to the
point where the entire double-stranded DNA is completely denatured.
Samples with heterozygous SNPs can then be easily be distinguished from
the wild type by the different shapes of their melting curves.
- Difference Plot:
the differences in melting curve shape are further analyzed by
subtracting the curves from a reference curve. This helps cluster
samples automatically into groups that have similar melting curves
(e.g., those who are heterozygote as opposed to homozygotes).
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
SNP
Genotyping by High Resolution Melt (Corbett Life Science)
Discrimination
of human ACTN3 (R577X) SNP genotypes (C to T substitution) using
SYTO® 9 intercalation dye (no probes). Homozygous wild type,
mutation and heterozygote samples are shown on a standard normalized
melt curve (A) and a
difference plot normalized to mutant samples (B).
Amplification and HRM analysis was done using a Rotor-Gene 6000
instrument and genotypes were automatically assigned by the Rotor-Gene
software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently,
HRM was the subject of a detailed and independent Technology Assessment
report from the National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex, UK). A
wide range of sample types were tested, including examples of
challenging G to C and A to T single base substitutions. The full
report is now available for download =>
Mutation
Scanning by High Resolution Melt Analysis. Evaluation of Rotor-Gene
6000 (Corbett Life Science), HR-1 and 384-well LightScanner (Idaho
Technology)
White
H and Potts G.; National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex,
2006) NHS Technology Assessment Report
http://www.ngrl.org.uk/Wessex/downloads.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
Resolution Melt - TALKs:
HRM
dyes:
|
|
LCGreen
Melting Dyes
LCGreen
dyes are specifically designed for high-resolution melting curve
analysis to detect DNA sequence variants. The addition of LCGreen dyes
increase the melting temperature of DNA by 1-3 °C and may requre
adjustment of cycling parameters. The dyes are manufactured exclusively
by Idaho Technology and their chemical structures are unique among the
scientific and patent literature.
LCGreen
dyes are tailored specifically for Hi-Res Melting and have the unique
ability to detect heteroduplexes during melting analysis after PCR.
Just add the dye to your sample before PCR. LCGreen dyes are extremely
stable, do not inhibit PCR, and are "saturation" dyes that can detect
multiple PCR products in a mixture during melting analysis.
LCGreen
Plus+
RAZOR
TrainingLCGreen PLUS is a new member of the dye family tailored for use
in melting instruments with 96- or 384-well microtiter plates. It has
superb fluorescence intensity and can be used with other fluorescence
based PCR detection systems such as the Roche LightCycler®. For
optimal performance, the use of a high-resolution melting instrument is
required.
LCGreen
I
LCGreen
I is a dsDNA binding dye used for Hi-Res Melting curve analysis using
Idaho Technology’s HR-1™ instrument. This innovative dye is
manufactured exclusively by Idaho Technology and is designed
specifically for Hi-Res Melting analysis to detect DNA sequence
variants (SNPs, Insertions / Deletions).
http://www.idahotech.com/LCGreen/index.html
|



|
|
High-resolution
genotyping by amplicon melting analysis using LC Green.
Wittwer CT, Reed GH, Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Pryor RJ.
Clin Chem. 2003 49(6 Pt 1): 853-860

BACKGROUND:
High-resolution amplicon melting analysis was recently introduced as a
closed-tube method for genotyping and mutation scanning (Gundry et al. Clin
Chem 2003;49: 396-406). The technique required a fluorescently
labeled primer and was limited to the detection of mutations residing
in the melting domain of the labeled primer. Our aim was to develop a
closed-tube system for genotyping and mutation scanning that did not
require labeled oligonucleotides.
METHODS: We studied polymorphisms in the
hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A (HTR2A) gene (T102C), beta-globin
(hemoglobins S and C) gene, and cystic fibrosis (F508del, F508C,
I507del) gene. PCR was performed in the presence of the double-stranded
DNA dye
LCGreen, and high-resolution amplicon melting curves
were obtained. After fluorescence normalization, temperature
adjustment, and/or difference analysis, sequence alterations were
distinguished by curve shape and/or position. Heterozygous DNA was
identified by the low-temperature melting of heteroduplexes not
observed with other dyes commonly used in real-time PCR.
RESULTS: The six common beta-globin genotypes (AA,
AS, AC, SS, CC, and SC) were all distinguished in a 110-bp amplicon.
The HTR2A single-nucleotide polymorphism was genotyped in a 544-bp
fragment that split into two melting domains. Because melting curve
acquisition required only 1-2 min, amplification and
analysis were achieved in 10-20 min with rapid cycling conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution melting analysis of PCR products amplified
in the presence of LCGreen can identify both heterozygous and
homozygous sequence variants. The technique requires only the usual
unlabeled primers and a generic double-stranded DNA dye added before PCR
for amplicon genotyping, and is a promising method
for mutation screening.
|
|
SYTO
Dyes
SYTO 9 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain has been shown to stain
live and dead Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and it is a
component of the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kits (L-7007,
L-7012, L-13152).
SYTO ® dyes are cell-permeant nucleic acid stains that show a large
fluorescence enhancement upon binding nucleic acids. The SYTO dyes can
be used to stain RNA and DNA in both live and dead eukaryotic cells, as
well as in Gram-positive and Gramneg a tive bacteria. Available as
blue-, green-, orange- or redfluorescent dyes, these novel SYTO stains
share several important characteristics:
- Permeability to
virtually all cell membranes, including mammalian cells and bacteria
- High molar
absorptivity, with extinction coefficients >50,000 cm-1M-1 at
visible absorption maxima
- Extremely low
intrinsic fluorescence, with quantum yields typically <0.01 when not
bound to nucleic acids
- Quantum yields
that are typically >0.4 when bound to nucleic acids
SYTO
dyes differ from each other in one or more charac ter is tics,
including cell permeability, fluorescence enhancement upon binding
nucleic acids, excitation and emission spectra, DNA/RNA selectivity and
binding affinity.
|
|
Rapid,
sensitive, and discriminating identification of Naegleria spp. by
real-time PCR and melting-curve analysis.
Robinson
BS, Monis PT, Dobson PJ.
Appl
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5857-63.
Australian
Water Quality Centre, Private Mail Bag 3, Salisbury, SA 5108, Australia
The free-living
amoeboflagellate genus Naegleria includes one
pathogenic and two potentially pathogenic species (Naegleria fowleri,
Naegleria italica, and Naegleria australiensis) plus numerous benign
organisms. Monitoring of bathing water, water supplies, and cooling
systems for these pathogens requires a timely and reliable method for
identification, but current DNA sequence-based methods identify only N.
fowleri or require full sequencing to identify other species in the
genus. A novel closed-tube method for distinguishing thermophilic
Naegleria species is presented, using a single primer set and the DNA
intercalating dye SYTO9 for real-time PCR and melting-curve analysis of
the 5.8S ribosomal DNA gene and flanking noncoding spacers (ITS1,
ITS2). Collection of DNA melting data at
close temperature
intervals produces highly informative melting curves
with one or more recognizable melting peaks, readily distinguished for
seven Naegleria species and the related Willaertia magna. Advantages
over other methods used to identify these organisms include its
comprehensiveness (encompassing all species tested to date), simplicity
(no electrophoresis required to verify the product), and sensitivity
(unambiguous identification from DNA equivalent to one cell). This
approach should be applicable to a wide range of microorganisms of
medical importance.
|
|
Comparison
of SYTO9 and SYBR Green I for real-time polymerase chain reaction and
investigation
of the effect of dye concentration on amplification and DNA melting curve
analysis.
Monis
PT, Giglio S, Saint CP.
Anal
Biochem. 2005 340(1): 24-34.
Microbiology
Unit, Australian Water Quality Centre, Private Mail Bag 3, Salisbury,
SA 5108, Australia.
Following the initial
report of the use of SYBR Green I for real-time polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) in 1997, little attention has been given to the
development of alternative intercalating dyes for this application.
This is surprising considering the reported limitations of SYBR Green
I, which include limited dye stability, dye-dependent PCR inhibition,
and selective detection of amplicons during DNA melting curve analysis
of multiplex PCRs. We have tested an alternative to SYBR Green I and
report the first detailed evaluation of the
intercalating
dye SYTO9. Our findings demonstrate that SYTO9 produces highly
reproducible DNA melting curves over a broader range of dye
concentrations than does SYBR Green I, is far less inhibitory to PCR
than SYBR Green I, and does not appear to selectively detect particular
amplicons. The low inhibition and high melting curve reproducibility of
SYTO9 means that it can be readily incorporated into a conventional PCR
at a broad range of concentrations, allowing closed tube analysis by
DNA melting curve analysis. These features simplify the use of
intercalating dyes in real-time PCR and the improved reproducibility of
DNA melting curve analysis will make SYTO9 useful in a diagnostic
context.
|
|
The
use of new probes and stains for improved assessment of cell viability
and
extracellular
polymeric substances in Candida albicans biofilms.
Jin
Y, Zhang T, Samaranayake YH, Fang HH, Yip HK, Samaranayake LP.
Mycopathologia.
2005 159(3): 353-60.
Division
of Oral Biosciences, Faculty Dentistry, The Prince Philip Dental
Hospital,
University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, SAR, China.
Phenotypic and
genotypic cell differentiation is considered an important feature that
confers enhanced antifungal resistance in candidal biofilms. Particular
emphasis has been placed in this context on the viability of biofilm
subpopulations, and their heterogeneity with regard to the production
of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). We therefore assessed the
utility of two different labeled lectins Erythrina cristagalli (ECA)
and Canavalia ensiformis (ConA), for EPS visualization. To evaluate the
viability of candidal biofilms, we further studied combination stains,
SYTO9 and propidium iodide (PI). The latter combination has been
successfully used to assess bacterial, but not fungal, viability
although PI alone has been previously used to stain nuclei in fungal
cells. Candida albicans biofilms were developed in a rotating disc
biofilm reactor and observed in situ using confocal scanning laser
microscopy (CSLM). Our data indicate that SYTO9 and PI are reliable
vital stains that may be used to investigate C. albicans biofilms. When
used together with ConA, the lectin ECA optimized EPS visualization and
revealed differential production of this material in mature candidal
biofilms. The foregoing probes and stains and the methodology described
should help better characterize C. albicans biofilms in terms of cell
their viability, and EPS production.
|
|
EVAGreen
|
|
EvaGreen® dye
is a green fluorescent nucleic acid dye with features that make the dye
useful for several applications including qPCR, high-resolution DNA
melt curve analysis (HRM)1, real-time monitoring of thermophilic
helicase-dependent amplification (tHDA), routine solution DNA
quantification and capillary gel electrophoresis. The DNA-bound dye has
excitation and emission spectra very close to those of fluorescein
(FAM) or SYBR® dye Green I, making the dye readily compatible with
instruments equipped with the 488 nm argon laser or any visible light
excitation with wavelength in the region. EvaGreen dye is extremely
stable both thermally and hydrolytically, providing convenience during
routine handling. The dye is essentially nonfluorescent by itself, but
becomes highly fluorescent upon binding to dsDNA. EvaGreen dye is
nonmutagenic and noncytotoxic by being completely impermeable to cell
membranes, unlike SYBR Green I, which enters cell rapidly and is known
to be a powerful mutation-enhancer (Ohta, et el. Mutat. Res. 492,
91(2001).
The unique
properties of EvaGreen dye have made it particularly useful
in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) application. Compared with the
widely used SYBR Green I, EvaGreen dye is generally less inhibitory
toward PCR and less likely to cause nonspecific amplification. As a
result, EvaGreen dye can be used at a much higher dye concentration
than SYBR Green I, resulting in more robust PCR signal.
Features:
- Very Little PCR
inhibition: Exhibit much less PCR inhibition than SYBR Green I via a
smart "release-on-demand" DNA-binding technology.
- Highly
Sensitive: Low PCR inhibition of the dye
permits a higher dye concentration to be used for much greater
fluorescent signal and high-resolution melt curve analysis (HRM).
- Nonmutagenic and
noncytotoxic: Nonmutagenic and noncytotoxic by standard Ames
test; completely impermeable to cell membranes (see below).
- Compatible with Fast PCR
protocol: Minimal interference to PCR makes it possible to
significantly shorten the chain extension time.
- Compatible with multiplex
PCR: No dye migration from amplicon to amplicon when
used at the recommended concentration
- Unsurpassed Thermal
Stability, Hydrolytical Stability and Photostability:
No detectable dye decomposition in PCR buffer at 95-100°C for 48
hours; highly stable under either alkaline or acidic condition;
withstand repeated freeze-thaw cycles
- Spectrally similar to
SYBR Green I: Compatible with all major brand qPCR
instruments and enzyme systems
|
|
Summary
of Mutagenic Toxicity Test Results for EvaGreen
Nucleic Acid Detection Technologies
Compiled by Biotium, Inc. from the results of an independent testing
service: Litron Laboratories, Inc., Rochester, NY
|
|
DNA
quantification using EvaGreen and a real-time PCR instrument.
Weijie
Wanga, Kunsong Chena and Changjie XuCorresponding Author Contact
Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author
aState
Agricultural Ministry Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Growth,
Development and Biotechnology, Huajiachi Campus, Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310029, People’s Republic of China
Analytical
Biochemistry
Volume
356, Issue 2, 15 September 2006, Pages 303-305
DNA quantification is
an important, frequently used technique, and inaccuracies can result in
failures with ligation, restriction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR),1
amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), Southern blotting, and
other techniques. DNA is most commonly quantified using absorbance at
260 nm, but because of the existence of many impurities, this can be an
imprecise measurement and DNA levels can be more than 10 times
overestimated in some cases [1]. Quantification by agarose gel
electrophoresis with a known amount of standard DNA [1] and [2] can
provide more accurate data, but the procedures are complicated, the
data often still are not accurate enough, and the technique is
impractical for routine or high-throughput DNA quantification [3].
Fluorescence spectroscopy using various DNA intercalating dyes is the
most widely accepted technique for accurate DNA quantification [4].
However, if the analysis is to be carried out with a fluorescence
spectrophotometer, a relatively large assay volume (e.g., 2 ml) is
required [5], and this is impractical for small DNA samples and
expensive dyes. Fluorescence can also be measured with a smaller volume
of DNA sample using other instruments such as fluorescent microplate
readers [6], microplate fluorometers [7] and [8], and
transilluminator–microplate–CCD camera systems [9], but the instruments
might not be readily available in most molecular biology laboratories.
|
|
Characterization
of EvaGreen and the implication of its physicochemical properties
for qPCR applications.
Mao
F, Leung WY, Xin X.
BMC
Biotechnol. 2007 7(1): 76
BACKGROUND:
EvaGreen (EG) is a newly developed DNA-binding dye that has recently
been used in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), post-PCR DNA melt curve
analysis and several other applications. However, very little is known
about the physicochemical properties of the dye and their relevance to
the applications, particularly to qPCR and post PCR DNA melt curve
analysis. In this paper, we characterized EG along with a widely used
qPCR dye, SYBR Green I (SG), for their DNA-binding properties and
stability, and compared their performance in qPCR under a variety of
conditions. RESULTS: This study systematically compared theDNA binding
profiles
of the two dyes under different conditions and had these findings: a)
EG had a lower binding affinity for both double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)
and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) than SG; b) EG showed no apparent
preference for either GC- or AT-rich sequence while SG had a slight
preference for AT-rich sequence; c) both dyes showed substantially
lower affinity toward ssDNA than toward dsDNA and even lower affinity
toward shorter ssDNA fragments except that this trend was more
pronounced for EG. Our result also demonstrated that EG was stable both
under PCR condition and during routine storage and handling. In the
comparative qPCR study, both EG and SG exhibited PCR interference when
used at high dye concentration, as evident from delayed Ct and/or
nonspecific product formation. The problem worsened when the chain
extension time was shortened or when the amplicon size was relatively
long (>500 bp). However, qPCR using EG tolerated a significantly
higher dye concentration, thus permitting a more robust PCR signal as
well as a sharper and stronger DNA melt peak. These differences in qPCR
performance between the two dyes are believed to be attributable to
their differences in DNA binding profiles. CONCLUSION: These findings
suggest that an ideal qPCR dye should possess several DNA-binding
characteristics, including a "just right" affinity for dsDNA and low or
no affinity for ssDNA and short DNA fragments. The favorable
DNA-binding profile of EG, coupled with its good stability and
instrument-compatibility, should make EG a promising dye for qPCR and
related applications.
|
|
|
Capillary
electrophoresis of double-stranded DNA fragments using a new
fluorescence intercalating dye EvaGreen.
Sang F, Ren J.
J Sep Sci. 2006 29(9): 1275-1280.
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.

EvaGreen is a new
DNA intercalating dye successfully used in quantitative real-time PCR.
In the present work, we firstly apply EvaGreen to the analysis of dsDNA
by CE with LIF detection. Comparisons of EvaGreen dye with the commonly
used dyes SYBR Green I and SYBR Gold were preformed in dsDNA analysis
by CE. The linear range of dsDNA using EvaGreen was slightly wider than
that using SYBR Gold and SYBR Green I, and the detection limits of
dsDNA were not significantly different for the three dyes. Good
separations of dsDNA fragments were obtained using the three dyes.
Reproducibility of migration time and the peak area of dsDNA fragments
with EvaGreen were better than those for SYBR Green I and SYBR Gold.
The RSD values were 0.24-0.27% for migration time and 3.45-7.59% for
peak area within the same day, 1.35-1.63% for migration time and
6.72-12.05% for peak area for three days. Our data demonstrated that
EvaGreen is well suited for the dsDNA analysis by CE with LIF detection.
|
|
HRM with SYBR Green (by Corbett Life
Science)
Moreover, the use of
SYBR® Green 1 (SYBR) for HRM is actively discouraged by some
authors (Wittwer et al 2003;
Reed, Kent & Wittwer, 2007).
Liew
et al (2004) state that SYBR can only be used for HRM after
substantial modification of the protocol (including the use of
GC-clamps, triple primers, and allele-specific PCR). By contrast, we
and others (Price et al 2007; Pornprasert et al 2008) have
found SYBR to
be a very successful dye for HRM analysis that does not require any
protocol modifications. We unhesitatingly recommend its use with a
Rotor-Gene 6000.
Prejudice against
SYBR stems from early evidence collected on instrumentation that was
not ideal for the task. Original assertions were based on experiments
done with a pre-HRM era LightCycler™ capillary-based real-time analyzer
(Roche Molecular Systems) using templates that included a low mass DNA
size ladder (Wittwer et al 2003;
Liew et al 2004). The
reason SYBR was less successful than LCGreen was “not entirely clear”
at the time, but a “dye redistribution” hypothesis was suggested (Wittwer et al 2003). According
to this hypothesis, SYBR dye releases from low-temperature duplexes
during melting and dynamically re-intercalates into neighboring
duplexes that melt at higher temperature. This mechanism became the
basis for the “dye saturation model” (Wittwer et al 2003, Liew et al 2004). According to this
model, if sufficiently high concentrations of dye are used such that
all binding positions on the DNA are occupied (i.e. saturated), then
dye redistribution effects are minimized and greater melting curve
resolution can be achieved. So-called “saturating dyes” were defined as
those that can be used at concentrations sufficiently high to saturate
all DNA binding sites without inhibiting the PCR. This model formed the
basis for IP protection and a patent by
Witter et al and Idaho Technology.
In spite of the
saturation model, mounting evidence clearly shows that it is not valid
on the Rotor-Gene 6000 HRM instrument. This is true for a range of
dyes, including SYBR (manuscript in preparation). In fact, SYBR used at
standard non-saturating concentrations is highly suitable for HRM
analysis, as illustrated below for the detection of a Class 4 SNP. We
therefore urge users not to dismiss the use of SYBR for HRM.
The reason saturating
dye levels are not required for HRM on the Rotor-Gene 6000 (when
apparently required on other instrument systems) is not clear. We have
limited experience with competing instruments, however it must be noted
that the centrifugal rotary format employed by the Rotor-Gene is
distinctly different to other HRM instrumentation. Importantly, the
Rotor-Gene has 25–50 times the thermal precision of other instruments
and the shortest, most sensitive, and most uniform optical path. It
also averages multiple readings for each data point reported at each
discrete programmed thermal setpoint in a HRM. Surprisingly, Reed et al
(2007) claim that the Rotor-Gene can only “approach high-resolution
data quality by melting at slower rates”. Ironically, it may be that
the slightly slower and more deliberate thermal stepping used by the
Rotor-Gene is partly why it achieves superior HRM results without the
need for a “saturating dye”.
RESEARCH
REPORT
Genotyping a Class 4 SNP
by high resolution melt (HRM) using SYBR Green I
Alister Kwok, Brant Bassam, and Valin Reja, August 2007
|
|
SensiMix
HRM (Quantace)
SensiMix HRM has been
designed for High Resolution Melt (HRM) analysis on the Rotor-Gene
6000. To learn more about the applications of HRM and to see some
data from our mix, please click
here. |
 |
FEATURES
-
HRM optimised mix with a separate vial of EvaGreen dye.
-
Ultra-high sensitivity: detects class 4 (A/T) SNP mutations.
-
Comes in 250, 500 and 2000 (25µl) reaction packs.
-
HRM™ demo kit containing this mix is available to Corbett Life Science
Distributors.
|
|
|
|
BEBO
for qPCR and HRM
TATAA Biocenter, Odinsgatan 28, 41103
Goteborg, Sweden
BEBO
is
an unsymmetric cyanine dye developed by TATAA Biocenter for use in qPCR
applications.
The
dye has absorbance and emission wavelengths that can be detected on
the FAM channel on most common real-time PCR platforms, and shows a
strong fluorescence increase when bound to dsDNA. BEBO can be used as
an unspecific dye for real-time PCR applications or other applications
where staining of dsDNA is wanted.
A
new minor groove binding asymmetric cyanine reporter dye for real-time
PCR
Martin
Bengtsson, H. Jonas Karlsson, Gunnar Westman and Mikael Kubista*
Department
of Chemistry and Bioscience, Chalmers University of
Technology 41296 Goteborg and
TATAA Biocenter,
Odinsgatan 28, 41103 Goteborg, Sweden
Nucleic
Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 8 e45
The minor groove binding
asymmetric cyanine dye 4-[(3-methyl-6- (benzothiazol-2-yl)-
2,3-dihydro- (benzo-1,3-thiazole)
-2-methylidene)]- 1-methyl-pyridinium iodide (BEBO) is tested as
sequence nonspeciÆc label in real-time PCR. The
Fluorescence intensity of BEBO increases upon binding to double-stranded DNA allowing
emission to be measured at the end of the elongation phase in the PCR cycle. BEBO concentrations
between 0.1 and 0.4 mM generated sufÆcient Øuorescence
signal
without
inhibiting the PCR. A comparison with the commonly used reporter dye
SYBR Green I shows that the two dyes behave similarly
in all important aspects. |
More detailed
description of HRM papers, you will find at the Corbett Life Science
web
page:
=>
http://www.corbettlifescience.com/control.cfm?page=Publications%5F3&langID=1
Further
literature and references by Roche Applied Science:
=>
https://www.roche-applied-science.com/sis/rtpcr/htc/htc.jsp?id=060000
|
|